In 2016, I...

turned 26.

taught a college creative writing course.

took long, productive and necessary breaks from social media.

published five essays, two stories and a poem.


went to USC basketball, baseball and football games.

walked my dog.

finished a draft of my novel that I didn't hate. 

taught creative writing to elementary schoolers.

published some writers I love in Yemassee.

visited Los Angeles for my fifth straight AWP conference.

defended my thesis.

read 29 books.

helped publish some writers I love in Banango Street.

bought books.

watched the Pistons make the playoffs for the first time since 2008.

played euchre.

drank beer.

went camping.

ate scones.

made a website.

finished my Master of Fine Arts degree.

started blogging about the NBA.

moved away from a college campus for the first time.

went to minor league baseball games.

got a big boy job.

taught creative writing to middle schoolers.

guest edited Smokelong Quarterly.

married my #onetruelove.

became a bicycle commuter.

gave up football.

published a chapbook.

taught journalism to college students.

gave up teaching.


received 25+ rejections. 

started a third (and hopefully final) draft of my novel.

had my favorite story accepted by an all-time favorite journal.

had my wisdom teeth pulled.



had my first Christmas in South Carolina. 


 Illustration by  Josh Quick

Illustration by Josh Quick

My essay, "A Case Against NaNoWriMo," went live over at the Submittable blog today. Many thanks to Asta So for accepting the piece, Rachel Mindell for the smart edits and Josh Quick for the awesome illustration.

An excerpt:

There’s a reason I try to hold my tweets, to limit the shots I take at NaNoWriMo participants. I’m no expert writer or teacher; I have no right to advise. Each of our creative processes feels unconventional and unique, because it is. But for many writers, serious or fledgling, trying to write so much so quickly is a stunting mistake. NaNoWriMo can be as dangerous as it is enticing, the potential for failure and frustration more likely than the chances of walking into December with your magnum opus under your arm.


I'm happy announce that my chapbook SKIN, a collection of prose poems, is forthcoming from Corgi Snorkel Press. Sal and Theresa, the editors at Corgi Snorkel, describe it like this:

Using the music of rapper/pop culture mogul Aubrey “Drake” Graham as a springboard, poet Justin Brouckaert delivers a collection that is as emotionally affecting as it is lyrical and playful. Skin fluctuates beautifully between lovesick wanderlust and over-the-top bravado in a way that mimics and reflects upon Drake’s best tracks and albums, and these poems will stay with you long after you’ve finished the collection, the cadences and concerns of Brouckaert settling over you like a thick, second coating.

SKIN's official release date is August 20, but it's available for preorder here. 

Publication announcements

I'm happy announce that I'm now a staff writer for Piston Powered, a Fansided blog. You can read my first few articles here.

The folks at NANO Fiction were also kind enough to include me in their "How I Write" interview series. You can read that here

The Best Sentence I Read This Week

We’re talking about a streak where, okay, there’s something like nearly 4 million children born every year, right? And LeBron has been in the Finals every year since 2010. This means we’re talking about a streak where the last near 24 million people born on this planet have only existed in a universe where LeBron James is in the NBA Finals.
— Shea Serrano

The best sentence I read this week came from Shea Serrano’s Tuesday newsletter Basketball (And Other Things), which featured Kawhi Leonard erotica and a section called CATCH THESE BLESSINGS or HANDS, from which this short snippet was taken.

I like this sentence, the last one in the paragraph, not just because it contextualizes LeBron James’s absurd success, but because it lays the groundwork for the Finals series to come.

For as much praise as the King deserves, people aren’t really talking about him right now. They’re talking about Steph Curry and the Warriors, who, just a week ago, completed a comeback that would have seemed impossible for any other team. Steph Curry, one half of the Splash Brothers, who somehow managed to win a title before the dynamic Russ and KD, once considered perennial-title-contenders-slash-LeBron-foes-in-waiting. Now the Oklahoma City Thunder are one or two playoff exits away from being mentioned in the same breath as the Steve Nash “Seven Seconds or Less” Phoenix Suns, the Chris Webber-led Sacramento Kings--great teams unable to make it through the NBA's brutal Western Conference gauntlet.

Everyone wants to talk about Steph Curry, who ruined LeBron’s homecoming once already and will gladly do it again.

I’m not a fan of either the Cavaliers or the Warriors, but I love the narratives at work in this rematch. Let’s not talk about LeBron winning one for The Land or Steph Curry turning basketball scoring on its head. Let’s talk instead about how the Warriors emerged so unexpectedly, how they’ve come so far, fueled by impossible excellence and drama and glee, and how they leave nothing but heartbreak in their wake. How every Steph bomb is impossible, a bullet point on a resume for a career that was supposed be only about potential, flashes of brilliance between catastrophic failures of the body. A strong will wedded to a faulty machine.

When the Clippers are beaten handily by their rivals, and Chris Paul is left stomping and whining in disbelief, as if he’s saying, “This should be mine,” we can't help but agree. In the moments LeBron is hit by the impossibility of it all, the unfairness that such a great player should be repeatedly beaten by such great teams, we can't help but empathize. The Warriors are party crashers, mood spoilers, the show no one expected. And they're poised to once again ruin LeBron's fun.


I thought I was over my resentment of LeBron. Since 2009, the year Cleveland put an end to the Goin’ to Work era of Detroit basketball, I’d grown at first resigned and then attached to watching him dominate the East--first in a Heat jersey, a change of color that helped ease my anger, then back with the Cavs. But watching him run through a much different Pistons team in the first round of this year's playoffs brought it all back: I couldn't stand his smug game face, his faux nobility, the comical outrage that a referee should dare call him for a charge.

It's easy to resent the man for his consistent all-around brilliance. It's easy to hate him. But with the Warriors set to wrap up Year 2 of NBA domination, it feels like the dynamics are starting to change. Steph's cockiness is beginning to grate; Draymond's flailing limbs are branding him dirty. And meeting them on the other side is a man they're making look less like the villain we're accustomed to, more like the hero we didn't think we'd need.


That last Detroit playoff run, in 2009--it broke the Pistons’ own run of six straight conference finals, a streak that only seems more ridiculous as the years go on. After beating Detroit, LeBron lost to Boston. Cue the decision, the move to South Beach. The Pistons were broken up completely, and my interest in them waned. Instead, I watched LeBron. I watched him reinvent himself to the effect of both success and failure. It wasn’t until this past year I grew interested in a young Pistons team again. From 2010 to 2015, a long period of absence from an otherwise strong life of fandom. LeBron was in the Finals the entire time I was gone.


I skipped writing a blog post last week because I was busy moving into a new place, and one of things moving makes you do--besides recoil in disgust at the amount of dust and grime you've accumulated--is reflect. True, my last place held memories much more important than basketball, but, much like I'll remember watching Game 6 of Heat/Spurs in my best friend's bedroom, I'll always remember sitting on the living room floor with my back against the couch in that Enoree duplex, watching LeBron take the Warriors to six games almost singlehandedly in 2015. I'll remember marveling at that moment, baffled that one player could make such an impact on a game.

I have no interest in a Michael Jordan/LeBron James debate, but I do understand the attachment old heads have to MJ. What he is to them, what Steph Curry is for today's tweens, LeBron is for me. I grew up with the guy. We transformed together. Basically the only difference between us is that he's a supremely gifted athlete with a billion-dollar Nike deal and I'm blogging for free, wearing a tie-dye sweatband indoors because I can't afford to crank the AC.

These Finals, and the ones to follow, feel especially rife with Legacy Questions: How will we remember LeBron if his Finals record is 2-7, 2-8, 2-9, a loss for every year of continued Golden State dominance? Will it be in disappointment that his quest to Win One For The Land was thwarted so many times? Or amazement that he had so many chances, that he led so many different teammates to the brink of greatness?

Here are some other dope sentences I read this week:

Teenage runners — some in buns of their own, others sporting ponytails — descended to seek selfies or autographs or just get a word and a smile from Pappas, a professional distance runner whose free-spirited persona off the track, perhaps more than her performances on it, has made her something of a cult figure in the insular world of track and field.
— Sam McManis, "Alexi Pappas Veers Far From Her Lane" (NY Times)
Can a poem enact training our eyes towards the thing that will bring us to light and closer to change, instead of focusing on the part of the memory that will bring us to and keep us in sorrow?
— Ross Gay, Divedapper interview
When I read books that are outside of my identity, I tell myself to shut up. I try to take people at their word about their experience. I hope people can engage with the book, but I also hope there are parts of the book that people are a little more puzzled by. I want them to just shush, and listen, and let me talk about this singular black experience for a while. I want them to let me talk about my feelings and not try to tell me about what blackness or whiteness or America is or isn’t. I hope we all just shush as we read.
— Danez Smith, Divedapper interview
Social scientists working on a decades-long population study have recently concluded that every single living resident of the United States suffers from a condition known as imposter syndrome, a psychological phenomenon in which people are unable to internalize their accomplishments, except for you, an actual fraud who is almost certainly on the verge of being found out by the people who only think they love and respect you any day now.
— Mallory Ortberg, "Everyone Has Imposter Syndrome But You" (The Toast)